Reconsideration of Surgical Indication for Prolactin-producing Pituitary Tumor Focusing on Visual Impairment.

Prolactin-producing pituitary tumor (PRLoma) is the most prevalent functional pituitary tumor. If the tumor becomes large, vision can be impaired. In contrast to other pituitary tumors, cabergoline (CAB) is extremely effective for PRLoma and has become the first-line treatment. In this study, we examined our experience with the pharmacological and surgical management of PRLomas with visual impairment (VI) to determine whether VI could be a surgical indication. Further, we discussed the function of surgery in situations where the gold standard of PRLoma treatment was CAB administration. Of the 159 patients with PRLomas (age, 13-77 [mean = 36.3] years; men, 29; women, 130) at Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital from 2009 to 2021, 18 (age, 15-67 [mean = 35.8] years; men, 12; woman, 6) had VI (subjectively, 12; objectively, 6). They started CAB treatment immediately (maximum dose: 0.5 to 6 mg/week; average: 2.17 mg/week). VI improved in 16 patients (88.9%) but did not improve in 2 (11.1%) requiring surgeries. One of the two patients had a parenchymal tumor resistant to CAB, and the other had a cystic tumor due to intratumoral bleeding. Consequently, CAB is the first-line treatment for PRLomas with VI because of its significantly high rate of improvement. However, close and rigorous surveillance is necessary for cases resistant to CAB, and the correct decision is required regarding surgical interventions at proper timing and appropriate surgical approaches considering the purpose of surgery.

Researching Eyesight Trends IN ADHD (RETINA).

BACKGROUND: There has been limited exploration of the relationship between ADHD and vision impairment, especially in relation to ADHD medication regimens and age. This study aims to examine trends in visual disorders in young patients with ADHD. METHODS: We analyzed deidentified patient records from TriNetX database. Patients under 22 years old were divided into cohorts based on ADHD status and medication regimen. We compared prevalence of vision disorders between cohorts. RESULTS: We studied over 1 million patients. The ADHD cohort had higher rates of all visual disorders than their non-ADHD peers. Medication usage was found to have a slight impact, with non-stimulants associating with higher rates for all outcomes. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that the higher occurrence of visual disorders in ADHD is not primarily due to misdiagnosis or medication effects. There is a need for regular eye care in ADHD patients and further investigation into the role of ADHD medications in eye health.

Central Toxic Keratopathy After Collagen Cross-Linking: A Case Series.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report a case series of central toxic keratopathy (CTK) after collagen cross-linking (CXL) in keratoconus. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series between January 2020 and September 2021. In this period, CXL was performed for progressive keratoconus in 964 eyes. CXL was performed using the epithelium-off accelerated protocol in all patients with a riboflavin soak time of 20 minutes and a UVA light exposure of 9 mW for 10 minutes using the Avedro KXL (Glaukos Inc, Aliso Viejo, CA) cross-linking system. RESULTS: Twelve of 964 eyes (1.2%) developed CTK within 1 week of CXL. All patients presented with well-circumscribed, central disciform haze that was broader in the anterior stroma and narrower in the posterior stroma. We noted initial flattening in keratometry up to 3 months post-CXL in these patients, which gradually steepened over 12 months, but did not reach preoperative levels. We also noted exuberant flattening in pachymetry in the first 3 months, which improved over 12 months. There was a statistically significant decrease in pachymetry in patients who developed CTK at 3 and 12 months postoperatively when compared to patients who underwent CXL but did not develop CTK. CONCLUSIONS: Several reports of CTK postrefractive surgery have been described previously. However, the association of CXL in the development of CTK has not been described previously. Here, we elucidated the clinical features of CTK after CXL and how it differs from corneal scarring or haze that occurs post-CXL.

Characteristics of Ocular Inflammatory Side Effects Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in a Northern California Population.

PURPOSE: To characterize the ocular inflammatory side effects associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) treatment in a Northern California population. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: Patients receiving CPI within an integrated healthcare delivery system. METHODS: All patients within Kaiser Permanente Northern California receiving CPI between January 1, 2012 and November 1, 2018 were identified. Medical records of those seen in the ophthalmology clinic at least once were retrospectively reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Type and duration of ocular inflammation, indication for and exposure to CPI, time from exposure to diagnosis of ocular inflammation. RESULTS: 31 cases of ocular inflammation were identified in 5061 patients (0.61%) receiving CPI. Mean ± SD age was 67 ± 11.9 (range 38-89). Mean time from exposure to diagnosis was 6.8 ± 5.5 months (range 0.5-17). 87% of cases were bilateral, and 43% of cases were chronic. Average ophthalmology follow-up was 16 ± 18 months (range 0-71). 16/31 (52%) had anterior uveitis, 7/31 (23%) had serous retinal detachment or panuveitis resembling Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome, 4/31 (13%) had papillitis, and 6/31 (19%) had diplopia or ocular motility defect. There was one case each (3.2%) of melanoma associated retinopathy, corneal edema, granulomatous lacrimal gland enlargement, and choroidal neovascularization. CONCLUSIONS: Ocular inflammation is a rare immune associated side effect of CPI treatment, the most common manifestation of which is anterior uveitis.

Bilateral herpes zoster ophthalmicus in an immunocompetent patient.

INTRODUCTION: Bilateral herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) is rare. We report a case of an immunocompetent patient with nonsimultaneous attacks of HZO in both eyes. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 71-year-old female patient complained of blurred vision in the left eye for 1 week, which was treated with topical antiglaucomatous drugs due to elevated intraocular pressure. She denied any systemic diseases, but HZO had manifested as a rash with a crust over the right forehead skin 3 months earlier. Slit-lamp examination revealed localized corneal edema with keratin precipitates and mild anterior chamber reaction. Suspecting corneal endotheliitis, we performed aqueous tapping for detecting viral DNA, including cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, and varicella zoster virus (VZV) DNA, through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, but the PCR results were negative for all viruses. The endotheliitis resolved well after treatment with topical prednisolone acetate. However, the patient's blurred vision recurred in the left eye 2 months later. A dendritiform lesion on the left cornea was detected, and corneal scraping for PCR testing revealed VZV DNA. The lesion disappeared with antiviral treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral HZO is uncommon, particularly in immunocompetent patients. When in doubt, physicians should perform tests such as PCR testing to help establish a definite diagnosis.

Encouraging visual outcomes in children with idiopathic and JIA associated uveitis: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric uveitis is typically asymptomatic and may become chronic affecting ocular structures and vision. We evaluated visual outcomes, clinical features, medication, and uveitis activity in children with either idiopathic uveitis (idio-U) or juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated uveitis (JIA-U). METHODS: A longitudinal, population-based cohort study of children with uveitis in 2008-2017. The data included parameters for age, gender, age at diagnosis, laterality, chronicity, anatomical distribution, etiology, systemic association, uveitis activity, medication, and visual outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 119 patients aged < 16 years with uveitis were included. Uveitis was idio-U in 23% and associated with JIA in 77% of cases. 37% of the patients in the idio-U group and 65% in the JIA-U were girls (p = 0.014). The mean age at first uveitis was 10.0 (SD 3.4) years in idio-U and 5.5 (SD 3.3) years in JIA-U (p < 0.001). Anterior location of uveitis was noted in 74% in idio-U and 99% in JIA-U (p < 0.001). Mostly, uveitis was chronic (59% in idio-U and 75% in JIA-U) and bilateral (56% in idio-U and 64% in JIA-U). Topical corticosteroids were initially used by 89% and 100%, systemic corticosteroids by 30% and 27% in some extent during the follow-up, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) by 33% and 85% (p < 0.001) of the patients in idio-U and JIA-U, respectively. Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) were more common in JIA-U (55% vs. 15% in idio-U, respectively, p < 0.001). Most patients had normal visual acuity (Snellen > 0.8, [6/7.5]) in the affected eye and bilaterally in 85% idio-U and 70% JIA-U. Only 5 patients (4%) had visual impairment in one, but none in both eyes. Uveitis activity by SUN classification was 0 + in 81% and 72%, 0.5 + in 19% and 25%, and 1 + in 0% and 3% in the idio-U and JIA-U, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Children with uveitis have good visual acuity and a low rate for visual impairment. In addition, modern treatment with DMARDs and bDMARDs seems to save vision.

A comparative study of visual outcome in patients with optic neuritis treated with five or seven days of intravenous corticosteroid treatment.

BACKGROUND: Optic neuritis (ON), a major cause of visual impairment in young adults, is generally associated with rapid visual recovery when treated with intravenous methylprednisolone treatment (IVMPT). However, the optimal duration of such treatment is unknown, ranging from three to seven days in clinical practice. We aimed to compare the visual recovery in patients treated with 5-day or 7-day duration IVMPT. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with ON in São Paulo, Brazil, from 2016 to 2021. We compared the proportion of participants with visual impairment in 5-day and 7-day treatment schedules at discharge, at 1 month and between 6 and 12 months after the diagnosis of ON. The findings were adjusted to age, severity of the visual impairment, co-intervention with plasma exchange, time from symptom onset to IVMPT and the etiology of the ON to mitigate indication bias. RESULTS: We included 73 patients with ON treated with 5 or 7-day duration of 1 g/d intravenous methylprednisolone therapy. Visual impairment at 6-12 months in the 5-day or the 7-day treatment groups was similar (57% x 59%, p > 0.9, Odds Ratio 1.03 [95% CI 0.59-1.84]). The results were similar after adjusting for prognostic variables and when observed at different time points. CONCLUSION: Visual recovery is similar in patients treated with 5-day and 7-day duration treatments of 1 g/day intravenous methylprednisolone, suggesting a ceiling effect. Limiting the duration of the treatment can reduce hospital stay and costs, without interfering with clinical benefit.

Delayed reversal of methanol-induced blindness in an adult by a combination of erythropoietin and a high dose of methylprednisolone: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The clinical manifestation following methanol toxicity accounts for a life-threatening problem that contributes to metabolic disorders, neurological complications, blindness, and even death. There is no completely effective treatment to retain the patient's vision. Herein, we apply a new therapeutic strategy for the recovery of bilateral blindness in a patient who had ingested methanol. CASE PRESENTATION: A 27-year-old Iranian man with complete bilateral blindness was referred 3 days after accidental ingestion of methanol to the poisoning center at Jalil Hospital, Yasuj, Iran, in 2022. After taking his medical history, performing neurologic and ophthalmologic examinations, and routine laboratory tests, ordinary management was undertaken and counterpoisons were given for 4-5 days; however, the blindness did not reverse. Following the 4-5 days of unsuccessful standard management, he was given ten doses of subcutaneous erythropoietin 10,000 IU/12 hours twice daily, folinic acid 50 mg/12 hours, and methylprednisolone 250 mg/6 hours for 5 days. After five days, vision of both eyes recovered, reaching 1/10 in the left and 7/10 in the right eye. He remained under daily supervision until his release from the hospital, and he was discharged from the hospital 15 days post admission. In outpatient follow-up, his visual acuity was improved without having any side effects at 2 weeks after discharge. CONCLUSION: A combination of erythropoietin and a high dose of methylprednisolone were useful for relieving the critical optic neuropathy and improved the optical neurological disorder following methanol toxicity.

SEVERE VISUAL LOSS DURING ANTI-VEGF INTRAVITREAL INJECTIONS IN NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: TIMING, PROGNOSIS, AND OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY FINDINGS.

PURPOSE: Intravitreal injection (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the standard of care for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). However, a small subgroup of patients still experience severe visual impairment, which may be related to the number of IVI administered. METHODS: This retrospective observational study analyzed data from patients with sudden severe visual decline (≥15 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters loss between two consecutive IVIs) during anti-VEGF treatment for nAMD. Best-corrected visual acuity examination, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and OCT angiography (OCTA) were performed before every IVI and central macular thickness (CMT) and drug injected were collected. RESULTS: 1,019 eyes received anti-VEGF IVI for nAMD from December 2017 to March 2021. Severe VA loss occurred in 15.1% after a median of 6 (range 1-38) IVI. Ranibizumab was injected in 52.8% and aflibercept in 31.9% of cases. Functional recovery after 3 months was significant, without further improvement at 6 months. Visual prognosis relative to the percentage of CMT change showed better visual outcome in eyes with no substantial change in CMT compared with an increase of >20% or a decrease of >5%. CONCLUSION: In this first real-life study exploring severe VA loss during anti-VEGF treatment in patients with nAMD, it was found that it was not unusual for a ≥15 ETDRS letters loss to occur between two consecutive IVIs, often within 9 months of diagnosis and 2 months after the last IVI. Close follow-up and a proactive regimen should be preferred, at least in the first year.

Real-World Outcomes of Ranibizumab Treatment in French Patients with Visual Impairment due to Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion: 24-Month Results from the BOREAL-RVO Study.

INTRODUCTION: Information about real-world ranibizumab use is needed to optimize treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). The BOREAL-RVO study assessed treatment use, effectiveness, and safety of 24-month treatment with ranibizumab 0.5 mg in patients with visual impairment due to macular edema secondary to RVO in a real-world setting. METHODS: This was a multicenter, post-authorization, observational study in France, including patients starting ranibizumab for RVO. Primary endpoint was mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at month 6. Secondary endpoints were mean changes from baseline in BCVA at month 24 and central retinal thickness (CRT) at months 6 and 24, and treatment use in real-world setting. RESULTS: 226 branch RVO (BRVO) and 196 central RVO (CRVO) patients were enrolled; 71.7% and 70.9% completed the 24-month follow-up, respectively. In BRVO, mean (SD) baseline BCVA was 55.2 (18.7) letters, with gains of 14.3 (13.7), 14.1 (16.5), 13.0 (17.5), and 11.4 (20.1) letters at months 3, 6, 12, and 24, respectively. In CRVO, mean (SD) baseline BCVA was 40.4 (25.6) letters, with gains of 16.0 (21.2), 9.5 (25.4), 9.2 (27.7), and 8.3 (23.8) letters at months 3, 6, 12, and 24, respectively. At month 24, 52% of BRVO and 41% of CRVO patients had gains of 15 or more letters. In BRVO, mean (SD) CRT values at baseline and months 3, 6, 12, and 24 were 550 (175), 315 (104), 343 (122), 335 (137), and 340 (105) µm. In CRVO, mean (SD) CRT values at baseline and months 3, 6, 12, and 24 were 643 (217), 327 (152), 400 (203), 379 (175), and 348 (161) µm. On average, BRVO patients had 3.8 injections for 6.9 visits by month 6, and 7.2 injections for 19.7 visits by month 24. CRVO patients had 2.7 injections for 4.2 visits by month 6 and 7.1 injections for 21.1 visits by month 24. Factors predictive of better BCVA gain at month 6 were age under 60 at baseline, lower baseline BCVA and BCVA gain at month 3. There were no new safety findings. CONCLUSION: Major improvements in BCVA and CRT were observed at month 3 after the induction phase and then were sustained up to month 24, with a slight decrease, probably due to under-treatment. This study demonstrated ranibizumab to be a safe and effective treatment for BRVO and CRVO in the real-world setting, although more regular or proactive treatment could further improve outcomes.

Long-Term Outcomes of High-Dose Conbercept Treatment for Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization and Idiopathic Choroidal Neovascularization.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to report 2-year outcomes of intravitreal injection of high-dose conbercept (1 mg 2 + PRN scheme) for subjects with myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) and idiopathic choroidal neovascularization (iCNV) by optical coherence tomography angiography follow-up. METHODS: A total of 38 subjects (38 eyes) were enrolled in this retrospective study, which were divided into group A (mCNV, 20 subjects, 20 eyes) and group B (iCNV, 18 subjects, 18 eyes). All subjects received 1.0 mg of conbercept intravitreally at diagnosis and again 35 days later. Additional conbercept injection was administered upon findings of decreased best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA); metamorphosis aggravation, macular hemorrhage, or edema; increased central retinal thickness (CRT); or leakage observed by fluorescein angiography. The BCVA, CRT, and CNV areas of the two groups were evaluated at baseline and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: The BCVA of group A improved from 0.31 ± 0.16 logMAR at baseline to 0.12 ± 0.03 logMAR at the final follow-up (p < 0.001), while in group B the corresponding improvement was from 0.33 ± 0.16 logMAR at baseline to 0.12 ± 0.03 logMAR at the final follow-up (p < 0.001). Visual acuity improved in 17 subjects in group A and 15 in group B, while it remained stable in 3 subjects in each of groups A and B. CRT decreased from 311.83 ± 30.95 µm in group A and 351.17 ± 37.09 µm in group B preoperation to 229.56 ± 5.75 µm and 227.67 ± 4.98 µm at 24-month follow-up, respectively (p < 0.001 in groups A and B). Metamorphopsia was improved in subjects in groups A and B. CNV had disappeared in the two groups at the last postoperative visit. The BCVA, CRT, and CNV areas showed no statistical differences between the two groups at 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Intravitreal injection of conbercept (1 mg 2 + PRN scheme) is effective for treating patients with mCNV or iCNV, which can improve and stabilize vision as well as dramatically alleviate metamorphopsia.

Four-Year Visual Outcomes in the Protocol W Randomized Trial of Intravitreous Aflibercept for Prevention of Vision-Threatening Complications of Diabetic Retinopathy.

Importance: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections in eyes with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) without center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) reduce development of vision-threatening complications from diabetes over at least 2 years, but whether this treatment has a longer-term benefit on visual acuity is unknown. Objective: To compare the primary 4-year outcomes of visual acuity and rates of vision-threatening complications in eyes with moderate to severe NPDR treated with intravitreal aflibercept compared with sham. The primary 2-year analysis of this study has been reported. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial conducted at 64 clinical sites in the US and Canada from January 2016 to March 2018, enrolling 328 adults (399 eyes) with moderate to severe NPDR (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] severity level 43-53; range, 0 [worst] to 100 [best]) without CI-DME. Interventions: Eyes were randomly assigned to 2.0 mg aflibercept (n = 200) or sham (n = 199). Eight injections were administered at defined intervals through 2 years, continuing quarterly through 4 years unless the eye improved to mild NPDR or better. Aflibercept was given in both groups to treat development of high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) or CI-DME with vision loss. Main Outcomes and Measures: Development of PDR or CI-DME with vision loss (≥10 letters at 1 visit or ≥5 letters at 2 consecutive visits) and change in visual acuity (best corrected ETDRS letter score) from baseline to 4 years. Results: Among participants (mean age 56 years; 42.4% female; 5% Asian, 15% Black, 32% Hispanic, 45% White), the 4-year cumulative probability of developing PDR or CI-DME with vision loss was 33.9% with aflibercept vs 56.9% with sham (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.40 [97.5% CI, 0.28 to 0.57]; P < .001). The mean (SD) change in visual acuity from baseline to 4 years was -2.7 (6.5) letters with aflibercept and -2.4 (5.8) letters with sham (adjusted mean difference, -0.5 letters [97.5% CI, -2.3 to 1.3]; P = .52). Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration cardiovascular/cerebrovascular event rates were 9.9% (7 of 71) in bilateral participants, 10.9% (14 of 129) in unilateral aflibercept participants, and 7.8% (10 of 128) in unilateral sham participants. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with NPDR but without CI-DME at 4 years treatment with aflibercept vs sham, initiating aflibercept treatment only if vision-threatening complications developed, resulted in statistically significant anatomic improvement but no improvement in visual acuity. Aflibercept as a preventive strategy, as used in this trial, may not be generally warranted for patients with NPDR without CI-DME. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02634333.

[Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Episcleritis and Scleritis]. / Diagnostisches und therapeutisches Management der Episkleritis und Skleritis.

While episcleritis is a benign disease only affecting the episclera, scleritis is an ocular inflammation with typically severe pain and not rarely affecting adjacent tissue.Scleritis is classified into anterior and posterior forms. Anterior scleritis is further subdivided into diffuse, nodular, necrotizing with inflammation, and necrotizing scleritis without inflammation (scleromalacia perforans). A systemic disease such as rheumatoid arthritis or granulomatosis with polyangiitis is associated with up to 50% of all patients with scleritis or episcleritis, consequently a systemic work-up with blood sampling and imaging as well as collaboration with internists are necessary.Differentiating these two entities is of high importance for planning the treatment: episcleritis has a self-limited course, whereas treatment of scleritis is obligatory to protect patients from irreversible visual loss, organ damage, and furthermore reduce the risk of mortality.Treatment depending of subtype and associated systemic disease may involve non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.

Optimizing treatment for diabetic macular edema during cataract surgery.

Diabetic macular edema (DME) causes visual impairment in diabetic retinopathy (DR). Diabetes mellitus is a global epidemic and diabetic individuals are at risk of developing DR. Approximately 1 in 10 diabetic patients suffers from DME, which is the commonest cause of vision-threatening DR at primary-care screening. Furthermore, diabetes predisposes to a higher frequency and a younger onset of cataract, which further threatens vision in DME patients. Although cataract extraction is an effective cure, vision may still deteriorate following cataract surgery due to DME progression or recurrence, of which the risks are significantly higher than for patients without concurrent or previous history of DME at the time of operation. The management of pre-existing DME with visually significant cataract is a clinical conundrum. Deferring cataract surgery until DME is adequately treated is not ideal because of prolonged visual impairment and maturation of cataract jeopardizing surgical safety and monitoring of DR. On the other hand, the progression or recurrence of DME following prompt cataract surgery is a profound disappointment for patients and ophthalmic surgeons who had high expectations for postoperative visual improvement. Prescription of perioperative anti-inflammatory eye drops is effective in lowering the risk of new-onset DME after cataract surgery. However, management of concurrent DME at the time of cataract surgery is much more challenging because DME is unlikely to resolve spontaneously even with the aid of anti-inflammatory non-steroidal or steroid eye drops. A number of clinical trials using intravitreal injection of corticosteroids and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) as first-line therapy have demonstrated safety and efficacy to treat DME. These drugs have also been administered perioperatively for the prevention of DME worsening in patients undergoing cataract surgery. This article reviews the scientific evidence to guide ophthalmologists on the efficacy and safety of various therapies for managing patients with DME who are particularly vulnerable to cataract surgery-induced inflammation, which disintegrates the blood-retinal barrier and egression of fluid in macular edema.

Acute cortical blindness caused by neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus.

A man in his 30s, who presented with fevers and a diffuse purpuric rash, developed sudden-onset visual loss on day 2. He was unable to perceive light in either eye. Examination by a neurologist confirmed cortical blindness, and the MRI showed subtle juxtacortical infarcts and leptomeningeal enhancement in the occipital region. Further history taken in the patient's native language revealed a history of untreated systemic lupus erythematosus. A diagnosis of central nervous system lupus was made and he was treated promptly with pulse methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide. His vision gradually improved to 80% on day 10 and eventually returned to baseline. He continued with high-dose prednisolone and monthly cyclophosphamide for 6 months and remained on hydroxychloroquine and mycophenolate mofetil with no relapses. This case shows the importance of approaching the uncommon but potentially dangerous issue of acute visual loss with a broad differential.

Massive retinal infiltrates as the presenting sign of chronic myeloid leukemia: Clinical and imaging features of leukemic retinopathy.

PURPOSE: To describe the clinical and optical coherence tomography (OCT) features of two cases with bilateral diffuse retinal infiltrates as the only presenting feature of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) on initial diagnosis and upon relapse. METHODS: We reported two patients with CML, one at initial diagnosis and one in remission who presented with bilateral subacute visual impairment. Fundal examination revealed bilateral symmetrical leukostatic appearance with increased vascular tortuosity, diffuse retinal infiltrates with size up to 6 disk diameters, retinal hemorrhages, and Roth's spots. OCT showed multiple intra-retinal hyper-reflective foci corresponding to intra-retinal hemorrhages, and outer retinal hyper-reflective foci in area corresponding to retinal infiltrate. The different retinal layers were relatively preserved and distinguishable. RESULTS: White cell count (WCC) were elevated in both patients ranging from 544 to 810 × 109/L. Bone marrow biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of CML in the patient without prior diagnosis and relapse of CML in another patient. Cytogenetic test detected Abelson murine leukemia (ABL) - breakpoint cluster region (BCR) fusion transcript in both cases. Both patients were started on oral imatinib, subsequently WCC returned to within normal values in both cases. Vision and OCT abnormalities improved and reduction in retinal hemorrhages and infiltrates were observed in follow up. CONCLUSION: This report highlights the important role of ophthalmologists and detailed fundus examination in making a prompt diagnosis of leukemia in patients with visual complaints. Appropriate systemic investigation and hematologist referrals for prompt treatment of CML may improve survival rate and preserve vision.

Unusual Presentation of Acute Hydroxychloroquine Retinopathy.

PURPOSE: To report a rare case of cystoid macular edema (CME) as a presentation of acute hydroxychloroquine-related retinal toxicity. OBSERVATIONS: A 37-year-old female patient visited our ophthalmology department in October 2019 complaining of bilateral blurred vision and metamorphopsia for 3 days. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 6/6 in the right eye and 6/7.5 in the left eye under the Snellen E chart. Before presentation, she had taken hydroxychloroquine as a "reproduction-facilitating medication" prior to the in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures with the daily dose of 200 mg for 1 week in March 2019 and 400 mg for 1 month in September 2019. She also took a combination of several herbal medicine including "Angelica sinensis" for 6 months in this period. On examination, typical signs of hydroxychloroquine maculopathy such as bilateral paracentral retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) change in blue autofluorescence and loss of the paracentral ellipsoid zone in optical coherence tomography ("flying saucer sign") were noted. CME was also found in fluorescein angiography. Her symptoms improved gradually after cessation of hydroxychloroquine and herb medicine without any further treatment. Resolution of bilateral CME was revealed at 16 weeks with final bilateral BCVA 6/6. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Although rare, acute hydroxychloroquine maculopathy could occur in patients with concomitant usage of medications that could interfere with P450 enzymes system. Careful acquisition of drug history and serial ophthalmological examinations are advised in using hydroxychloroquine for disease management even for a short period of time.

Direct Tie2 Agonists Stabilize Vasculature for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema.

Purpose: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the leading cause of vision loss and blindness among working-age adults. Although current intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies improve vision for many patients with DME, approximately half do not achieve the visual acuity required to drive. We therefore sought additional approaches to resolve edema and improve vision for these patients. Methods: We explored direct agonists of Tie2, a receptor known to stabilize vasculature and prevent leakage. We identified a multivalent PEG-Fab conjugate, Tie2.1-hexamer, that oligomerizes Tie2 and drives receptor activation and characterized its activities in vitro and in vivo. Results: Tie2.1-hexamer normalized and stabilized intercellular junctions of stressed endothelial cell monolayers in vitro, suppressed vascular leak in mice under conditions where anti-VEGF alone was ineffective, and demonstrated extended ocular exposure and robust pharmacodynamic responses in non-human primates. Conclusions: Tie2.1-hexamer directly activates the Tie2 pathway, reduces vascular leak, and is persistent within the vitreal humor. Translational Relevance: Our study presents a promising potential therapeutic for the treatment of DME.

Details and outcomes of a large cohort of MOG-IgG associated optic neuritis.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to examine the temporal relationship of eye pain to visual loss and investigate whether timing of steroid treatment affects the rate and extent of visual recovery in optic neuritis (ON) from MOG-IgG associated disease (MOGAD) in a large cohort of MOGAD patients with ON. METHODS: This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of consecutive MOGAD patients with ON attacks seen from 2017 to 2021 fulfilling the following criteria: (1) clinical history of ON; (2) MOG-IgG seropositivity. ON attacks were evaluated for presence/duration of eye pain, nadir of vision loss, time to intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) treatment, time to recovery, and final visual outcomes. RESULTS: There were 107 patients with 140 attacks treated with IVMP and details on timing of treatment and outcomes. Eye pain was present in 125/140 (89%) attacks with pain onset a median of 3 days (range, 0 to 20) prior to vision loss. Among 46 ON attacks treated with IVMP within 2 days of onset of vision loss, median time to recovery was 4 days (range, 0 to 103) compared to 15 days (range, 0 to 365) in 94 ON attacks treated after 2 days (p = 0.004). Those treated within 2 days had less severe VA loss at time of treatment (median LogMAR VA 0.48, range, 0.1 to 3) compared to those treated after 2 days (median LogMAR VA 1.7, range, 0 to 3; p < 0.001), and were more likely to have a VA outcome of 20/40 or better (98% vs 83%, p = 0.01). After adjustment for the initial VA at time of treatment, the differences in final VA were no longer significantly different (p = 0.14). In addition, some patients were documented to recover without steroid treatment. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that pain precedes vision loss in the majority of ON attacks and early steroids may lead to better outcomes in MOG-IgG ON, but some patients can recover without steroid treatment. Prospective randomized clinical trials are required to confirm these findings.